3 reasons judges break their pen after a death sentence

Contents

History of judges breaking their pen after death sentences There are three symbolic reasons why a judge might break a pen after passing a sentence:1. Special circumstances of use 2. A heavy heart 3. Irrevocability of his actions

The tradition of breaking a pen after a death sentence among judges all over the world has deeply symbolic and historical meaning.

Most judges write down their judgement and sentencing before giving reading it out, but whenever a judge gives a death sentence to an accused person, he breaks his pen. Why?

History of judges breaking their pen after death sentences

The practice of breaking the nib after passing a death sentence dates back to the Mughal dynasty in India. It was around this time that the Mughal Emperor would break the quill used to sign death sentences. This approach was later adopted by British justices in colonial India and extended after India attained independence.

There are three symbolic reasons why a judge might break a pen after passing a sentence:

It should be noted that this practice is not codified by law, yet many judges do it voluntarily.

1. Special circumstances of use

The pen is broken to mean it has served its purpose. The pen was used to take a life and can’t be used for any other purpose. Death sentences are special because they aren’t given out every day.

2. A heavy heart

It means the judge feels sombre about passing a death sentence. This is a symbolic act that emphasises the judge’s emotional weight and responsibility in deciding someone’s fate.

3. Irrevocability of his actions

When judges do it, it conveys the finality and irrevocability of a death sentence, which cannot be reversed once imposed.

Although most countries have revoked death penalties as punishment for crimes, 55 countries still enforce them.