By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SO KONNECTSO KONNECTSO KONNECT
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • News
  • Music
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Politics
Reading: ConCourt rules Executive Ethics Code is unconstitutional, unlawful and invalid
Share
Font ResizerAa
SO KONNECTSO KONNECT
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • News
  • Music
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Politics
Search
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • News
  • Music
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Politics
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© Sokonnect News Network.. All Rights Reserved.
Home » Blog » ConCourt rules Executive Ethics Code is unconstitutional, unlawful and invalid
News

ConCourt rules Executive Ethics Code is unconstitutional, unlawful and invalid

sokonnect
Last updated: September 20, 2022 9:43 am
sokonnect Published September 20, 2022
Share
SHARE

Contents
Ramaphosa’s CR17 campaignCR17 report



The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has ruled that the Executive Ethics Code is unconstitutional, unlawful and invalid.

The highest court in the land on Tuesday ruled that the Executive Ethics Code is unconstitutional because it does not require members of the executive to disclose donations they receive for internal party political campaigns.

The case will have a bearing on donations to the campaigns of politicians seeking positions in their parties.

ALSO READ: ConCourt reserves judgment in amaBhungane’s case challenging Executive Ethics Code

It found “this code falls short of the constitutional and statutory requirements of transparency” and the lack of a requirement of the disclosures of internal party donations severely undermine the Political Party Funding Act.

Ramaphosa’s CR17 campaign

The previous ruling by the ConCourt means donations made to Cyril Ramaphosa‘s “CR17” campaign for the ANC presidency won’t have to be made public.

The case, brought by investigative journalism unit amaBhungane, arose from litigation concerning Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s report into a donation to Cyril Ramaphosa’s presidential campaign in 2017.

Oral arguments were heard in May.

amaBhungane’s challenge came after the Executive Ethics Code was found to be unconstitutional as it did not require members of the executive to disclose “donations made to campaigns for their election to positions within political parties”.

The Pretoria High Court, in December 2021, ordered that the Act’s declaration of invalidity “shall have no retrospective effect and shall be suspended for a period of 12 months to allow for the defect to be corrected”.

This meant that the source of Ramaphosa’s CR17 campaign would remain undisclosed.

CR17 report

amaBhungane’s case also stemmed from Ramaphosa’s successful bid to challenge Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s report on the CR17 campaign finances.

The ConCourt in July 2021 dismissed Mkhwebane’s application for leave to appeal.

The Public Protector had approached the ConCourt after her report into the CR17 campaign was set aside in March 2020 by the Pretoria High Court.

She released the report on the CR17 campaign in July 2019.

ALSO READ: Court ruling in Mkhwebane’s favour of no effect until ConCourt confirmation – expert

TAGGED:CodeConCourtEthicsexecutiveinvalidrulesunconstitutionalunlawful
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Email Print
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© Sokonnect News Network.. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?